Why is the world such a good place?

The World is such a great place because I can have an idea and improve the lives of millions.

Q&A on Quora

Tiger

The World is such a great place because I can have an idea and improve the lives of millions.

The fact that my ideas are ignored by every Journalist in the World and not acknowledged by Malcolm Turnbull and Theresa May is not important. What is important is that President Trump has acknowledged me.

What is even more important is that in our World of Political Selfishness and Corporate irresponsibility it is still possible to have the dream, to live for the hope and achieve the impossible.

One day my ideas will improve the lives of those peoples who cannot help themselves and the lives of creatures great and small whom mankind appears to be so intent on destroying. That is my dream.

What are your 3 biggest personal problems?

Malcolm Turnbull. This is because he does not seem to understand that the sun is the largest nuclear power station in the Universe and it likes Australia.

This is my answer to this Q on Quora.

Malcolm Turnbull. This is because he does not seem to understand that the sun is the largest nuclear power station in the Universe and it likes Australia. That means we could have the largest solar power station in the World powering China.

Theresa May. Because May has never responded to my ‘New Perspective on Terrorism and ISIS’. This despite the fact my writing could stop one terrorist attack and by doing so save lives. Both Theresa May and MI5 are not able to write as I do. Click Here to Read

President Trump. Because he has not responded to my on-going on-line Strategy for the ‘Drug Crisis in America. Click Here to Read

They are personal problems as I do not understand why it is that Governments listen to the same solution’s and ignore new ideas with new solutions. Not just my new ideas but those of others too. If the World is to progress then the People must be heard.

Do you like America?

Yes. In fact if President Trump invited me to America so that I could further my writing to improve our World my bag is already packed.

 

HRUK12

Yes. In fact if President Trump invited me to America so that I could further my writing to improve our World my bag is already packed.

That is because here in the UK my writing to improve the World has been completely ignored and UK State Agencies have tried to silemce me.

The UK media will not report me – I could discover a cure for cancer and still they would not report me.

The UK Government does not respond to any of my communications regarding improving our World and they should because some of my work is on Counter Terrorism and ISIS.

But guess who has responded? The White House and President Trump. I have been to America four times and each time whenever I spoke to people my new ideas for a better world were encouraged.

America has attitude. The people want to improve their lives and that is what the UK lacks and why I like America.

X2WhiteHouse

Why am I ignored by Theresa May but not by President Trump?

Why is it that when I write to Theresa May I get no response. Even when I wrote about the way my 88 year old Mum was treated in a Care Home – Zero. But when I write to President Trump the White House responds.

HRACT1

Why is it that when I write to Theresa May I get no response. Even when I wrote about the way my 88 year old Mum was treated in a Care Home – Zero. But when I write to President Trump the White House responds.

 

What do you think of Chinese human rights?

China may not have the fine words so often spoken by Theresa May when she lectures the World about Human Rights but China at least does not pretend to be something it is not.

 

HRACT1

I would describe them as I would for the United Kingdom.

They have become the property of our Governments who have decided without the consent of the people that they can be removed at the will of the Government.

I would also state that China’s Human Rights are incrementally improving whilst those of the United Kingdom’s are regressing.

Never in the history of the United Kingdom has a Government been so ignorant of the will of the people and so selfish of its own political ambition.

China may not have the fine words so often spoken by Theresa May when she lectures the World about Human Rights but China at least does not pretend to be something it is not.

The photo is of the children of Yemen. Many of whom have died from bombs supplied by a United Kingdom Government who have ignored their right to life.

 

What is the importance of young people in your country developing a sense of national belonging, patriotism and pride? How would these values help the development of your nation?

Weak and ineffective leadership. Corruption. Social division. A weakness in enforcing Law and Order. A hypocrisy of intervention in wars which kill children. An acceptance of homelessness. A tolerance of absolute Poverty and a World Political System that devours the democracy of the people as if their human rights did not exist.

 

HRACT1

This is my answer to the Question which is on Quora.

There can be no other example of National Pride than that which can be placed within the reach of Young People by those who set themselves up as their Peers. It leads the way for young people to set for themselves the achievements and possibilities that their Nation can make possible for them.

Yet, what do they have as examples? Weak and ineffective leadership. Corruption. Social division. A weakness in enforcing Law and Order. A hypocrisy of intervention in wars which kill children. An acceptance of homelessness. A tolerance of absolute Poverty and a World Political System that devours the democracy of the people as if their human rights did not exist.

Our World Leaders are weak, ineffective, decisive and support corruption as if it were the New Black.

Even President Trump has failed to act on stopping the cancerous growth of Evil by Global Groups who peddle filth drugs and trafficking as if it were worthy of no more than a Parking Ticket.

The Youth of today need to demand an end to corruption and seek leadership that will achieve a World where ‘Crime does not Pay’.

Unfortunately, here in the UK a weak Tory Government and and ineffective Theresa May allow crime to run rampant as if it were not their responsibility.

Cutting Police and Health resources, allowing ‘Out of Control’ cyber-hacking and acting too little too late for widely-known sexual harassment of women in Parliament is not setting young people an example of National Pride.

Neither is ensuring they are not part of a developing European Culture by peddling Brexit as the new Nirvana when in fact it will become the UK’s worst ever Economic Disaster.

A sense of National Pride for young people is vital in seeking to maximise the Social and Economic benefits of a Nation and for preventing youth crime.

 

Is it worth it to sacrifice one million people to create everlasting world peace?

There can be no everlasting Peace that comes about with the death of a million people. The deaths of one million people and more occured in 1914–1918 and 1939–1945 with no everlasting Peace.

truth

This is my answer to this Q which is on Quora.

If I were the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, which is a country with nuclear weapons, which you would have to be equipped with in order to answer the question I would state this:

“Nuclear weapons have only one purpose and that is to kill in the millions. The only deterrent they have been is to ensure those Nations with Nuclear Weapons do not make a sudden decision to use them on other Nations with nuclear weapons.

They did not stop Al Qaeda killing 3000 Americans at 911 and they did not stop the Vietnam War or ISIS invading Syria and Iraq. I would use them at the negotiating table to provide a framework with other countries to discuss and achieve a planned and phased reduction in nuclear weapons. Which is a forum much promised but lacking in delivery.

However, if my only option to end an immediate threat to the United Kingdom from a nuclear military force was to use them specifically to bring an immediate end to the threat I would do so. It is highly unlikely that such a threat would involve one million civilians. It is also highly unlikely that such a situation would occur without any of the United Kingdom’s allies being involved. Therefore the question is too hypothetical to consider a more detailed response”.

I would also state that the United Kingdom as an Island is at much more of a risk from a hostile force than the majority of developed Nations. An island is a strategic target and one which is between Europe and the United States even more so. Unless we are able to ensure we know where every Nuclear Weapon in the World is there can never be a complete nuclear disarmament.

Theresa May did not give that answer. Without thinking May said ‘I would’ to the question by Jeremy Corbyn of would she kill 100,000 with a nuclear strike.

Let us hope that Theresa May is able to ‘think’ when faced with a real situation of a ‘United Kingdom under threat’.

Theresa May does not hesitate to say she would kill 100,000 with nuclear strike

There can be no everlasting Peace that comes about with the death of a million people. The deaths of one million people and more occured in 1914–1918 and 1939–1945 with no everlasting Peace.

1.5 million have died in Afghanistan since 1979. A negotiated Peace for the war weary people of Afghanistan is as distant as it has ever been.

If the World wants everlasting Peace then it must begin with the reform of the United Nations. The Security Council must be expanded, the veto dropped and every conflict dealt with by not taking sides.

 

Are we just a material?

Our Governments and Establishments have failed to progress Society and develop its Humanity so instead they seek to contain and control us in order to ensure our behaviour is predictable and manageable – this way they hope to contain crime and terrorism.

truth

This is my answer to the Question which was on Quora.

The Human Condition is evolving into something less than Human. In fact many are already at the point where it can be said that they are just a material.

Many people, particularly in the Western World, have accepted a way of interaction that has isolated them from the interaction of the human condition with those who are less fortunate.

Many are willing to accept a conditioned mediocre society as long as they are kept safe by whoever imposes conditions on their behavior and hence they become material.

However, by doing so they lose their freedom of expression and their ability to fight for the freedom of others. Life becomes ‘self-satisfied’ and a constant search for the next ‘experience high’.

Our Governments and Establishments have failed to progress Society and develop its Humanity so instead they seek to contain and control us in order to ensure our behaviour is predictable and manageable – this way they hope to contain crime and terrorism.

They ignore the root cause of crime and terrorism which is their failure to ensure fairness in mankind’s progression and instead seek to micro-manage the whole of their Societies.

We are at the end of ‘freedom of expression’. Our Governments will have to become more decronian and more controlling of our rights if Society is to continue to remain manageable.

To do that they need the ‘material condition’. The other developer of the ‘material condition’ is AI and its derivatives. This is a real threat to our Philosophical Freedom and has already been embraced by our Governments. AI can never produce Philosophy as it incapable of free thought. It is Philosophy that develops humanity and produces the actions for mankind that progress the ‘human condition’ ie civilization.

To confront a Government with your own ideas is now almost as if you are going to war with them. They simply no longer listen. They fear ideas other than their own because they do want a new Philosophy which may displace their own ideologies.

The material condition is encouraged and fostered to ensure that Citizens are too afraid to seek other than their own material satisfaction.

The United Kingdom and Theresa May are the leading examples in the Western World of how the ‘material society’ is progressing. May is at the forefront of imposing new controls on the Internet that will only seek to increase the divide between the State and its People.

The acceptance of the failure of our Governments to manage our Economies fairly is at the root cause of the emergence of the ‘material condition’.

Terrorism and Crime thrive on Economic Mismanagement which is a symptom of modern Governments inability to accept new ideas – the vicious circle of the Ivory Tower.

Hence the ‘Protection of the Material’ and its embryonic human condition ‘the need to be selfish’ so that there is no need to concern yourself with the actions of your Governments on Human Rights.

MayCensorship

What are the ramifications of bringing back a foreigner from a short-term mission trip in a third world country to the United States for a visit?

Sayyid Qutb went to America and judged the U.S. by its materialism and not its National Conscience which seeks to further the right of the individual to be given the opportunity to maximize their potential to themselves and the community.

truth

This is my answer to this Q on Quora.

The result could be an Al Qaeda. Sayyid Qutb was an Islamic Philosopher who after spending time in the United States went on to write Ma’alim fi al-Tariq or Milestones. Sayyid Qutb – Wikipedia

Sayyid Qutb was sentenced to death by the Egyptian Government but his work Milestones was used by Bin Laden to form the Ideology for Al Qaeda.

I have attempted to inform our Prime Minister Theresa May and MI5 that terrorism will not be defeated by force alone. However, my work which offers an alternative to writings of ISIS is ignored by the UKGOV.

There must be an alternative to the theory and rewriting of the Quran by ISIS. The written word when used to foster a cause is a very powerful weapon.

The UKGOV and MI5 seem unable to understand how terrorism has rapidly developed into a creed. It is a new religion using God as a surrogate tool to foster the belief of ISIS that they alone speak for God. It has been very cleverly developed by those who write for ISIS. The West has no alternative and will continue to suffer the tragic consequences.

Sayyid Qutb went to America and judged the U.S. by its materialism and not its National Conscience which seeks to further the right of the individual to be given the opportunity to maximize their potential to themselves and the community.

Sending a person from a third World Country would still produce the same result and perhaps more so as now they have ISIS to articulate their discontent with the inequality of rights.