Does Islamic State truly have a political agenda and aspirations or are they really beyond that and just seeking power through terror?

Therefore, we first need to stabilize Afghanistan and that means the US and the Taliban siting down and butting heads. The Taliban do not want ISIS in Afghanistan.

https://www.quora.com/profile/Desmond-Last

Nothing is constant and never is that more true than when discussing a force in a reaction. ISIS were always going to be and the West ensured that ISIS would evolve from dissatisfaction, frustration, anger and humiliation.

We propped up Governments who we knew would pursue our interests and their own – but never the people’s. ISIS are now in a state of flux, regrouping and ensuring they engage with those who do not want a Taliban Government in Afghanistan and a Western-backed form of democracy in Yemen, Libya, Syria and Iraq.

The Middle East has become a proxy for whoever can supply and arm it. President Trump is right to want to walk away from it all. If I were in Government I would say ‘I’m off call me back when you have Peace’.

Our dependence on Oil is decreasing so why should we be at the beck and call of a region that needs to find its own future rather than one we say it should have.

I want Peace for the Middle East but sometimes you have to walk away and let the ‘water find its own level’. The killing of innocent civilians has to stop – but how to do that?

ISIS is not one person. It has moderates as well as extremists. However, unless we bring Peace to Afghanistan we face the risk of a ‘Terrorist Superpower’. If Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban and Al Shabaab combine into a Military Force and not as disconnected terrorist organisations then we will face a new war in the Middle East. Afghanistan and Pakistan could end up as the latest Proxy War with China and Russia supporting whoever the U.S and West does not.

Therefore, we first need to stabilize Afghanistan and that means the US and the Taliban siting down and butting heads. The Taliban do not want ISIS in Afghanistan. They are fighting for their Country – ISIS were not invited.

ISIS has a Leader who will not turn back from the road he has taken. ISIS will continue to act as dragnet for anybody who has a grudge and a fanaticism. The terrorism will get worse a lot worse as other factors such as Climate Change refugees and a hardening of Western attitudes towards refugees and Aid cause more poverty and more isolation for those who have no Government to help them.

There are 65 million refugees and it is increasing. In that 65 million are those who ISIS will recruit for suicide bombing.

We must isolate ISIS. To do that we need a ‘united’ United Nations Security Council. Nobody is going to say you are in Cloud Cuckoo Land if you summarise that Russia and China are not ‘sympathetic’ to the needs of ISIS. Until the U.S, China and Russia are all on the same page for World Peace ISIS will continue to exist.

Will ISIS become political? It already has. It uses its version of the Quran as a Mandate voted in by the People who support ISIS to carry out as much carnage as possible to innocent people in the hope that they can enlarge their footprint.

I have warned the U.S and the U.K of the dangers of not being able to combat the ISIS Ideology. In particular I have advised Prime Minster May of the dangers of not supporting ‘New Philosophy ’ but Prime Minister May is as deaf to ‘New forms of Counter Terrorism’ as she is to any new idea not from her Ivory Tower of Political Isolationism.

Where the danger lies is in the evolvement of a Political Group who combine all the Terrorist Groups ideologues into a form of Political Philosophy to be used by the disaffected leading to internal unrest and uprisings in many countries – that will happen unless the West stops acting the hypocrite. The West must act as the International Convention of Human Rights demands. This must include a reformed militarised United Nations backed by every member of an enlarged Security Council to bring Peace to the many conflicts in the World.

ISIS are but a seed of disaffection and extremism. ISIS will continue to grow unless we deal with why it exists.

What are the ramifications of bringing back a foreigner from a short-term mission trip in a third world country to the United States for a visit?

Sayyid Qutb went to America and judged the U.S. by its materialism and not its National Conscience which seeks to further the right of the individual to be given the opportunity to maximize their potential to themselves and the community.

truth

This is my answer to this Q on Quora.

The result could be an Al Qaeda. Sayyid Qutb was an Islamic Philosopher who after spending time in the United States went on to write Ma’alim fi al-Tariq or Milestones. Sayyid Qutb – Wikipedia

Sayyid Qutb was sentenced to death by the Egyptian Government but his work Milestones was used by Bin Laden to form the Ideology for Al Qaeda.

I have attempted to inform our Prime Minister Theresa May and MI5 that terrorism will not be defeated by force alone. However, my work which offers an alternative to writings of ISIS is ignored by the UKGOV.

There must be an alternative to the theory and rewriting of the Quran by ISIS. The written word when used to foster a cause is a very powerful weapon.

The UKGOV and MI5 seem unable to understand how terrorism has rapidly developed into a creed. It is a new religion using God as a surrogate tool to foster the belief of ISIS that they alone speak for God. It has been very cleverly developed by those who write for ISIS. The West has no alternative and will continue to suffer the tragic consequences.

Sayyid Qutb went to America and judged the U.S. by its materialism and not its National Conscience which seeks to further the right of the individual to be given the opportunity to maximize their potential to themselves and the community.

Sending a person from a third World Country would still produce the same result and perhaps more so as now they have ISIS to articulate their discontent with the inequality of rights.

Will there ever be peace in the Muslim world?

However, May is so unable to understand that the only group developing the ‘Word of God’ is ISIS. My own development of a new Perspective of the ‘World of God’ is ignored by both May and the U.K’s security services – with tragic results.

truth

This is my answer to this Q on Quora.

There will never be Peace in the Muslim World until all Muslims accept that God is not their property.

God represents the freedom we all seek but have been unable to achieve.

Our inability to understand that the ‘Word of God’ is not a set of instructions on how to live every minute of our lives but a Philosophy which was intended by God and his followers that mankind should adopt and develop has created conflict.

The Quran and the Bible are both of no use other than to promote conflict and prejudice unless we develop the Philosophy contained within them into a democracy of thought and an understanding of each other.

Unfortunately, our Leaders both in Goverment and of the Faiths have used ‘religion’ to promote themselves and to separate their own ideologies from each other.

In doing so they have created division and disunity amongst peoples.

There is only one God and until the people of Islam work together there can be no Peace. They have allowed their historic differences to be used by those who seek to subjugate them for their own interests. ISIS has been particularly expert at developing the ‘New Quran’.

I have tirelessly attempted to explain by my writing to Theresa May that terrorism can never be defeated by force alone.

However, May is so unable to understand that the only group developing the ‘Word of God’ is ISIS. My own development of a new Perspective of the ‘World of God’ is ignored by both May and the U.K’s security services – with tragic results. The U.K establishment is unable to accept that the ‘Ivory Tower’ they reside in is more dangerous than ISIS. It promotes radicalism in answer to the division that it causes by being so publicly decisive.

ISIS have rewritten the Quran as the Word of God and ISIS. Whereas I have been writing of the ‘World of God and all his Peoples’. A vital point missed by Theresa May and MI5. Nobody reading my work will get into a truck and drive into innocent bystanders as they do with ISIS writing.

What would God do and say is a Question each Muslim should ask when he or she is asked to use their faith against another.

Muslims will need to unite as one in the ‘World of God’ if there is ever to be Peace.

starving syria

Will a Developed Brain 2 Computer Technology become the New World Order?

Will a developed Brain to Computer Technology become the New Terrorism

 


1998HumanRightsAct


Q. Why have I written this?

A. Because I care about our World and the National and Global Security that is needed to ensure that mankind has a future. I perceive the somewhat ‘strange’ attitude of the United States and U.K Security Organisations such as NATO and the CIA/MI5/6 to the ‘Runaway Effect’ of Brain 2 Computer Technology to be a liability to both National and Global Security. I can find no logical reason to explain their lack of understanding of what will if not controlled become a threat to Global Security other than they have been ordered to ignore its development – which in itself a contravention of their own Statutory Requirements to safeguard National Security.

Runaway Effect. An inbuilt organic exponential growth which accelerates as it extrapolates to the point where it becomes a critical mass whose growth cannot be that of a controlled technology but that of an uncontrollable virus.


Brain to Computer Communication is a fact. It is not Science Fiction. We can no longer consign it to the realm of ‘tin hats’ and ‘fanciful imagination’. Research into deciphering the electrical impulses from the mind began in 1875 by Richard Caton who was a British physician. Canton was crucial in discovering the electrical nature of the brain and laid the groundwork for Hans Berger to discover Alpha wave activity in the human brain.


Hitler and the Nazis also carried out the same research. At the end of WW2 1600 Nazi Scientists involved in weapons and associated research went to America with Operation PaperClip . Some were involved in mind research.


Operation Mk Ultra was the CIA’s Public incursion into Brain to Computer Research. The operation began in the early 1950s, was officially sanctioned in 1953, was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967, and officially halted in 1973.

 

page1-220px-ProjectMKULTRA_Senate_Report.pdf


In July 2017  the U.S.A. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DARPA awarded $65 million to develop the perfect, tiny two-way brain-computer interface. That is of course what we are told. No doubt the reality is that in 1875 Governments and Military learned of the possibility of being able to read and control the mind. It is highly likely that Governments and other interested parties have been investing in Brain 2 Computer Research from as far back as the early 1900’s. DARPA Brain Initiative is contracted out to the Private Sector. What are the safeguards in place to ensure a hostile agency, Country or Group have access?


 

Q. How far advanced is Brain 2 Computer Technology?

A. Nobody knows and that is why the CIA and other Nation’s Security Services must conduct an urgent audit of its progress. Brain 2 Computer Technology has the potential to be more dangerous than nuclear weapons. Why? Because it can be used to control nuclear weapons systems.


In the Research Laboratory the Technology may be hardwired. However, in the real world of Technology Criminal Exploitation a Developed B2C Technology could be  transmitted with an implant that was fitted to a U.S.A.F Fighter Pilot when he was asleep, in a hospital on a operating theatre, when he was in a crowd, when he put his clothing on or when his wife could fit it whilst he slept.  The implants are so small that they can barely be seen by the naked eye. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that at some point in time the B2C Technology will become organic and children will be born with it. All wired up, ready to be used and controlled.


Recently Elon Musk has invested in NeuraLink to also develop Brain 2 Computer Technology. My concern is that as we have not fully developed the Brain’s Capability all his research will do is prevent the natural development of the mind and increase the security risk of Brain 2 Computer Technology. Once a person is implanted with a connection that connection can then be accessed by anybody including those who may not operate in the best interests of National and Business Security. AI is not capable of original thought and never will be. AI will never be able to produce a new idea. Only the Human Brain has imagination.


The National Security Agency website states ‘Defending our Nation. Securing the Future.’ Really NSA ? Type in the words ‘ Dangers of Computer to Brain Technology’ into the NSA website search engine. What do you get – nothing. No warnings, no discussion not even a mention that somebody in your next business meeting could be ‘connected’ or your next Navy Seals Operation could be Wi-Fi’d to the enemy.


Q. How many People since 1875 to present day (2017) did not and have not survived  Research into Brain 2 Computer Technology?


Q. What has happened to all  those who have been experimented on?


Q. Is it possible to encrypt the information flow from the mind and ensure it is not  accessed by those who are not acting in the best interests of National and/or Global Security?

A. No it is not.


Q. Is Brain 2 Computer Technology a massive research program being undertaken by many Governments all over the World and which has no safeguards?


That is the problem. Our ‘intellectually challenged’ Governments do not appear to understand the ‘nightmare’ of what they developing and spending $millions and $millions on. The nightmare of Brain to Computer Technology is that is able to be used by anybody with a computer and the software for receiving and transmitting information from the Brain – and for many in our morally deficient world everything has a Price and many including ISIS and Al Qaeda as well as Criminals will pay it.


When the Commander of a United States Navy of the Ohio Class fitted with active strategic thermonuclear warheads next goes to the dentist and is put under could somebody insert a computer to brain implant into him? He would never know. Would an Intel Handler at R.A.F Northwood, Pine Gap in Australia, The Pentagon or GCHQ know? Were Intel handlers at any of these Security Installations checked for a developed Computer 2 Brain Technology in the last 24 hours, 48 hours, last week, last month, last year? Ever? Is there a Research Group carrying out Brain 2 Computer Technology Development who has access to Security Facilities?


The Brain 2 Computer Technology cannot and must not be allowed to be developed ad-hoc. Governments must ensure they know who is developing it and where and at what stage the development is at.

Personally I believe it all to be a waste of time and money. It has no benefit to mankind. Its only use is control and intrusion. But regardless of my opinion as to its real benefits to the progress of mankind the Security Implications are not merely an opinion. They are dangerously very real.

Brain 2 Computer Technology transmits visual, audio and mind information in binary form it can be accessed by anybody before it gets to the receiver . A bit like Wi-Fi is hacked into. Who has it fitted. Do you?

Experts-warn-growing-threat-monitoring-controlling-neural-signals.html


Warning: My urgent and immediate advice to those in Government, the Senior Military and the CIA/MI5/6 is to immediately audit and verify all research and all personnel in all fields of the Sciences and Behavioural Research who are or may be involved in Brain 2 Computer Research. This is necessary in order to account for the propagation and development of brain to computer technology. I believe this to be of the highest priority in order to maintain National & Global Security of those Nations with have nuclear and chemical weapons.


This is the summary of concerns listed in Wikipedia of Brain to Computer Interface.

Ethical considerations
Important ethical, legal and societal issues related to brain-computer interfacing are:
Obtaining informed consent from people who have difficulty communicating,
risk/benefit analysis.
Shared responsibility of BCI teams (e.g. how to ensure that responsible group decisions can be made).
The consequences of BCI technology for the quality of life of patients and their families.
Side-effects (e.g. neurofeedback of sensorimotor rhythm training is reported to affect sleep quality).
Personal responsibility and its possible constraints (e.g. who is responsible for erroneous actions with a neuroprosthesis).
Issues concerning personality and personhood and its possible alteration.
blurring of the division between human and machine.
Therapeutic applications and their possible exceedance.
questions of research ethics that arise when progressing from animal experimentation to application in human subjects.
Selective enhancement and social stratification.


These are my own concerns:

Mind-reading and privacy in Government, Business, Banking and Military.
Mind-control by allowing Terror Groups or Criminal Groups to Control and Direct.
Use of the technology in advanced interrogation techniques by governmental authorities,
Control of all Communication to and from the media.
Memory Loss and the development of only ‘controlled memory’ as the end of Free Thought.
Organic Development by insertion of bio engineered control system to allow complete control of brain electron circuits.
A new form of human physics which transforms mind motor neuron control to manmade body components whilst retaining the human form for structure.
Replacement of key individuals in Government and Military with Human Robot Controlled Humanoids.
The Eventual Replacement of Mankind as ‘Free Thought’ in order to save it from its own destruction by a Power Elite who seek their own Survival and Destiny through Total Control.
Total Power controls absolutely and must control all that is capable of Free Thought if it is to survive.


 

Summary.

Time and events will prove if my warning was right or wrong. However, can we as People allow a Brain 2 Technology be developed which ‘Creates mankind in the image of whoever controls the Technology’? I describe Brain 2 Computer Technology as a virus. Its rate of development is now exponential, it’s fitting to minds is unrestricted, its potential for control by a Group or Power who do not want democracy is only restricted by the amount they want to pay for its developed use. The danger of Brain to Computer Technology to the future of mankind can be measured in the megatons of TNT per metric ton of nuclear weapons.

What should be our greatest concern is that our Governments and their Security Agencies seem to be unaware of the dangers of a rapidly developing technology which has the real potential to access any mind anywhere at anytime. From the Nuclear Command systems of a submarine with nuclear weapons to the cockpit of a B52 Bomber armed with nuclear weapons Brain 2 Computer Technology has the potential to access every mind everywhere.

Does anybody care?

Desmond Last Updated 22 11 17

ISIS is now defeated but do you think ISIS still has supporters in many countries?

truth

This is my answer to this Quora Question.

Militarily ISIS may be defeated but ISIS did not sign a surrender document. As a cause ISIS is now very much stronger. ISIS will ‘tell’ its defeat in Iraq and Syria as just one further proof that it is a martyr for the cause of an Islamic State and the ISIS ‘out of context’ and self-directed interpretation of the ‘Word of God’.

Support for ISIS will increase in all European countries as it directs much of its resources to promote its ‘Word of God’ using its new martyrdom in its developing ‘Word of God’.

However, it is the U.K which is now more vulnerable to ISIS sponsored terror attacks than any other country in the Western World. It is horrible to have to say this but it is highly likely more people in the U.K will die of terror attacks.

The U.K is where ISIS can get the most support and publicity for its cause and the most success. The U.K with its lack of militarily policed borders and entry points, its random checks which miss so much, its lack of a policed coastline and over one million illegal immigrants is Europe’s terrorism ‘Sitting Duck’.

The increasing divide created by the Government Establishment is too another causal factor in increased support for ISIS. SO15 and MI5 do not work with the People. They increase the divide by not involving the Islamic Community of the U.K. Instead they view them all as ‘potential enemies’. These are all ‘ignition points’ for a terrorist attack.

I doubt if at anytime modern U.K history has there been more of a reality gap between the U.K Government Establishment and many of the U.K people. Such is the divide in the U.K between the ‘moral attitude’ of the U.K Establishment and many of its citizens what may once have been only a protest can now be evolved with the fuel of ISIS rhetoric into an act of terror.

Now more than ever there is an urgent need to direct those who may use ISIS as a conduit for their hatred of Western Governments and Western People to an alternative to ISIS’s Word of God.

I have written to the U.K Government and MI5 of the urgent need to develop a counter to the declared word of God ISIS but such is their ‘distance from reality’ I do not even get an acknowledgement.

Politicians such as Theresa May the U.K Prime Minister have no idea of how to deal with ‘home-grown’ terrorism and MI5 have not yet developed the theory of terror acts in the U.K in order to fully understand its cause.

ISIS is now a tool available to anybody who wants to use it. Be it for martyrdom or a simple hared of the U.K Government Establishment.

ISIS will use every opportunity to gain more support in the U.K from those who seek martyrdom as an opportunity to destroy their perception of the U.K as being a ‘Crucible of Evil.

There are inequalities in the U.K which do not apply the Law equally to all. They will be seized upon by ISIS and used to intensify the anger of their supporters and to increase that support. That is what the Amber Rudd, Theresa May and MI5 seem so utterly unable to understand.

Unfortunately what can only be described as an ‘intellectually challenged’ understanding of U.K developed Terrorism by Theresa May, Amber Rudd and in part by MI5 will only cost more lives.

bibla and quran

What is the difference between a lone wolf and a terrorist?

truth

My answer to this Quora Question.

There is a difference and it is an important one. A person who supports a terrorist organisation such as ISIS will understand ISIS’s misuse of the Word of God as being the only true development of God’s Word. They will use the misuse of the Quran to justify their acts of terror. ISIS will take a complete sentence or paragraph from the Quran and apply its historical belonging to our current world.

They will take historical events and mix them with the ‘Word of God’ handed down to the Prophet Muhammad and then apply an instruction to kill all those who oppose not the Quran and its teaching but ISIS.

ISIS is not a delivery of the Quran in its entirety. ISIS is a jealous selfish ownership of the meaning of the Quran in out of context phrases.

A terrorist who has an allegiance to ISIS as a the ‘voice of God’ is a person who sees him or herself as acting on behalf of God. They view everybody who does not swear allegiance to God’s new messenger – ISIS as being evil. Which is why it is so easy for them to kill innocent people. It does not matter to them who or where you are they will be carrying out the work of God as instructed by ISIS.

It should not be difficult to counter the ISIS misuse of the world of God but it is. My own experience with the U.K Government and MI5 has illustrated to me that they have no idea at all of how to deal with terrorism. Flooding the streets with troops will not stop a committed terrorist from carrying out his mission.

Religious terrorism begins with the misuse of the word of God and its application to the hypocrisy of the West. ISIS will use illegal acts of warfare and the support of corrupt Governments by the West as proof of their evil.

I have written a new perspective which develops the world of God in order that we have a counter to that of ISIS but both MI5 and the U.K Government will not even acknowledge my work. Yet if we as the West are not able to develop our own understanding of God and stop allowing our own acts of terror we will never defeat the terrorist. We must stop killing innocent civilians in conflicts and we must stop supporting corrupt Governments .

We must allow new understanding of God’s word to be developed if we are to successfully combat terrorism.

You could say ISIS and I are the only ones who have developed a new understanding of the World of God. ISIS will kill with theirs but I will save lives with mine.

Why then is my work so deliberately ignored by the United Kingdom Government and its Security Services? ISIS will use it as an example of the Evil of the West.

Now we have the Lone Wolf. The Lone Wolf will kill you because he received a Parking Ticket. The Parking Ticket may be the trigger to a whole series of real or perceived persecution by the State or by a group of individuals.

He is able to use the terror of ISIS and hijack it to his or her own hate of the World and ISIS will of course use every means to own that hate.

The Lone Wolf has a hatred of the World and in particular the Western World. Which is why the Lone Wolf is a Western manifestation. It may be that he has had enough of being targeted by the Establishment or others. He may view the acts of corruption and hypocrisy of the Government as a symbol of all that has ever gone wrong for him. He may want revenge for something that was done to his family.

The Lone Wolf is a perfect target for ISIS. They can adapt their writing to suit his circumstances. They do not have to be in contact with him. All they have to do is say they represent the fight against the Evil of the West and he or she will adopt their acts of terror.

How do we stop the Lone Wolf? First we must regain the moral high ground which ISIS have adopted. In order to do that we cannot support Government and Organisations that are corrupt and carry out acts of inhumanity.

We must involve our Police with the People not as the Front line of the Govemment. We as the West must practise what we preach – and we all know that we do not.

America must stop making it so easy to kill. That begins with a ban on all imported assault weapons and a limit to how many and how much ammunition you can own. The ‘acceptance of violence’ is an example that the Lone Wolf has in his or her mindset.

Lone Wolf’s will become more common. Our Governments and the U.K Government in particular are becoming more repressive and more decoranian as they seek to find new ways to combat terrorism and the Lone Wolf syndrome.

I will provide this example. Theresa May the U.K Prime Minister wants to make it illegal to browse terrorist information on the Internet. But is is needed to be read by those who seek to expose its hypocrisy.

Yet May does nothing to stop vile filthy groups through Google exploiting women and children on the Internet. Rather that go to the source May takes the easy option – which does nothing to stop those who are exploiting children and only serves to create further division as we all become MI5 subjects. This will provide some with further evidence of the Corruption of the West and lead Lone Wolf’s to want to punish or end it with violent acts.

Reading what ISIS writes does not turn you into a Lone Wolf or Terrorist. Unless it is accompanied by the West’s failure to apply human rights and an equal application of the Law to all.

Never has the gap between Government and the People been so big. Goverment have to end their arrogance, their corruption and their dishonest ‘spin’ if they want people to be part of one World and not so apart from it they will kill with no thought of the deaths and misery they will cause.

penmighter

What is it like to work with Theresa May?

This was answered by me on Quora.

This is not a conventional answer but it is an appropriate one. I am answering it as a U.K Citizen who has sent new ideas to the Prime Minister via the Cabinet Office and MI5.

I tried to work with Theresa May as first the Home Office Secretary and then as Prime Minister.

I sent Theresa May new ideas and systems for improving the U.K and the World.

I sent warnings and new systems for how to deal with Counter Terrorism.

My warnings about the increased terror threat to the U.K were unfortunately ignored and proved correct.

My new perspective on how to deal with radicalism and ISIS were also completely ignored.

May has also completely ignored my warnings about U.K based cyber-crime which will drive business away from the U.K.

In fact it would seem that whatever you send as a concerned citizen to Theresa May is completely and utterly ignored.

From my experience I would say that Theresa May does not know how to and does not want to listen to anybody outside her own inner circle.

You only have to watch May on TV answering questions to see that she gets annoyed if anybody dares to question her views.

That is my experience of trying to work with my Prime Minister. A Prime Minister who has yet to produce one new original new idea for the improvement of the U.K and the World whilst ignoring those that have new ideas.

From my Prime Minister and her Government Agencies I have never received an acknowledgement or a thank you.

However, when I sent my views to President Trump I received a signed thank you letter.

Good Government is one that works with its Citizens not one that ignores them.

FromPresidentTrump
From the White House on Behalf of President Trump. From 10 Downing Street – The silence is deafening.

Theresa May you are a Liability: A short discussion on Terrorism and Chemical Weapons.

If Theresa May wants to continue in her Ivory Tower to not accept new ideas and systems for the safety of the people of the U.K from outside her Establishment inner circle then all well and good but it should not be at the expense of the People May is required to protect.

The U.K Government and the Security Services continue to deliberately ignore my work on Counter Terrorism. Unless a new approach to Counter Terrorism is formulated there will I fear be more attacks in the U.K with a potential escalation to chemical weapons. ISIS has many of its followers returning from the Middle East and the U.K has done nothing to secure its borders. There they have learned new techniques including how to make and use chemical weapons .

This may be particularly important if any illegal group they could partner with such as a criminal Social Experiment Group, under the guise of a Civil Defense Exercise, have access to chemical weapons and any facilities and equipment for manufacturing them. It is also a concern if the same Social Experiment Group have access to Military Facilities using false Identities on the basis of Global representation.

There does not appear to be any formal precautions for such an attack on the People. Certainly there are no current warnings in place. Nor does there appear to be any system of monitoring or restricting chemical sales by volume to non-essential users unless granted a permit. There should be a flag system for any spike in anything to do with chemicals.
If there are such precautions they should be highlighted. If there is not then such a system(s) should be implemented immediately.

Yes this is a warning. If I am wrong then good. However if I am correct and the Security Services have not investigated any such Group then the consequences could be very very tragic.

The U.K Security Services still do not have any way of addressing ISIS followers allegiance to ISIS misuse of the ‘Word of God’. Theresa May continues to ignore any new ideas and systems as well as any perspective outside of her Ivory Tower – with tragic consequences.

Theresa May you are a liability because you simply refuse to accept that you and your Establishment do not know it all.

%d bloggers like this: